Citation of Two Retracted Papers Shows Both the Impact Advantage and an Unintended Consequence of Open Access

doi:10.3390/12092190

This article is

freely available
re-usable

Molecules 2007, 12(9), 2190-2192; doi:10.3390/12092190

Editorial

Citation of Two Retracted Papers Shows Both the Impact Advantage and an Unintended Consequence of Open Access

Shu-Kun Lin and Derek J. McPhee

Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI), Matthaeusstrasse 11, Basel CH-4057, Switzerland

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received: 16 September 2007 / Published: 19 September 2007

Download PDF Full-Text [33 KB, uploaded 2 October 2008 11:53 CET]

No abstract available

Article Statistics

Click here to load and display the download statistics.

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, S.-K.; McPhee, D.J. Citation of Two Retracted Papers Shows Both the Impact Advantage and an Unintended Consequence of Open Access. Molecules 2007, 12, 2190-2192.

AMA Style

Lin S.-K., McPhee D.J. Citation of Two Retracted Papers Shows Both the Impact Advantage and an Unintended Consequence of Open Access. Molecules. 2007; 12(9):2190-2192.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Shu-Kun; McPhee, Derek J. 2007. "Citation of Two Retracted Papers Shows Both the Impact Advantage and an Unintended Consequence of Open Access." Molecules 12, no. 9: 2190-2192.

Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI Publishing, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert