Going Round in Circles: Landauer vs. Norton on the Thermodynamics of Computation
AbstractThere seems to be a consensus among physicists that there is a connection between information processing and thermodynamics. In particular, Landauer’s Principle (LP) is widely assumed as part of the foundation of information theoretic/computational reasoning in diverse areas of physics including cosmology. It is also often appealed to in discussions about Maxwell’s demon and the status of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. However, LP has been challenged. In his 2005, Norton argued that LP has not been proved. LPSG offered a new proof of LP. Norton argued that the LPSG proof is unsound and Ladyman and Robertson defended it. However, Norton’s latest work also generalizes his critique to argue for a no go result that he purports to be the end of the thermodynamics of computation. Here we review the dialectic as it currently stands and consider Norton’s no go result. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Ladyman, J.; Robertson, K. Going Round in Circles: Landauer vs. Norton on the Thermodynamics of Computation. Entropy 2014, 16, 2278-2290.
Ladyman J, Robertson K. Going Round in Circles: Landauer vs. Norton on the Thermodynamics of Computation. Entropy. 2014; 16(4):2278-2290.Chicago/Turabian Style
Ladyman, James; Robertson, Katie. 2014. "Going Round in Circles: Landauer vs. Norton on the Thermodynamics of Computation." Entropy 16, no. 4: 2278-2290.