Next Article in Journal
Coincidences and Estimation of Entropies of Random Variables with Large Cardinalities
Next Article in Special Issue
Entropy Generation During the Interaction of Thermal Radiation with a Surface
Previous Article in Journal
Thermodynamics of Regular Cosmological Black Holes with the de Sitter Interior
Previous Article in Special Issue
Entropy Generation Analysis of Desalination Technologies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Radiation Heat Transfer on Entropy Generation at Thermosolutal Convection in a Square Cavity Subjected to a Magnetic Field

1
Chemical and Process Engineering Department, Engineers National School of Gabès, Gabès University, Omar Ibn El Khattab Street, Gabès 6029, Tunisia
2
Civil Engineering Department, High Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology, Gabès University, Omar Ibn El Khattab Street, Gabès 6029, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2011, 13(12), 1992-2012; https://doi.org/10.3390/e13121992
Submission received: 1 June 2011 / Revised: 27 June 2011 / Accepted: 21 July 2011 / Published: 28 November 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Entropy Generation Minimization)

Abstract

:
Thermosolutal convection in a square cavity filled with a binary perfect gas mixture and submitted to an oriented magnetic field taking into account the effect of radiation heat transfer is numerically investigated. The cavity is heated and cooled along the active walls whereas the two other walls are adiabatic and insulated. Entropy generation due to heat and mass transfer, fluid friction and magnetic effect has been determined for laminar flow by solving numerically: The continuity, momentum energy and mass balance equations, using a Control Volume Finite-Element Method. The structure of the studied flows depends on five dimensionless parameters which are: The Grashof number, the buoyancy ratio, the Hartman number, the inclination angle of the magnetic field and the radiation parameter.

1. Introduction

The study of radiative and magnetic field effects has important applications in physics and engineering. Hydromagnetic flow and heat transfer problems have received considerable attention, due to their applications in many industrial fields. The radiative flows of an electrically conducting fluid with high temperature in the presence of a magnetic field are encountered in various propulsion devices for satellites and interplanetary spacecraft, electrical power generation, astrophysical flows, solar power technology, space vehicle re-entry, nuclear engineering applications and other industrial areas. The unsteady flow past a moving plate in the presence of free convection and radiation was studied by Mansour [1]. The effect of suction/injection on the flow and heat transfer for a continuous moving plate in a micro polar fluid in the presence of rendition was studied by El-Arabawy [2]. Ibrahim et al. [3] studied radiative and thermal dispersion effects on non-Darcy natural convection with lateral mass flux for a non-Newtonian fluid from a vertical flat plate in a saturated porous medium. Dolapc and Pakdemirli [4] studied approximate symmetries of creeping flow equations of a second grade fluid. Transient radiative hydromagnetic free convection flow past an impulsively started vertical plate with uniform heat and mass fluxes was studied by Ramachandra et al. [5,6]. The magnetic field parameter has retarding effect on the velocity, temperature and concentration increase with increasing value of the magnetic field parameter. The time required to reach the steady state increases as radiation parameter increases [5]. For small values of the radiation parameter, the velocity and temperature of the fluid sharply increase as the time increases. The local and average Nusselt number increase with increasing value of radiation parameter.
Thermal radiation effects on MHD flow past an impulsively started vertical plate in the presence of heat source/sink was investigated [6]. Heat due to viscous dissipation was considered. As the radiation parameter increases, both the velocity and temperature increase, whereas the concentration decreases. An increase in the magnetic parameter decelerates the velocity. A rise in dissipative heat induces a substantial rise in both velocity and temperature. As the heat absorption/generation parameter increases, the velocity increases whereas the temperature decreases. An increase in the Schmidt number leads to a decrease in the velocity and concentration. Rani et al. [7] studied numerically the effects of radiation, magnetic field, variable viscosity and variable thermal conductivity on similarity solutions of mixed convection at a vertical flat plate embedded in a porous medium. In absence of a magnetic field, the parameter C takes the value unity, and for increasing intensity of the magnetic field, the parameter takes values smaller than unity. Reduced flow can be expected for smaller values of C or for increased intensity of the magnetic field as the Lorentz force (due to the magnetic field) obstructs the flow. When transfer of heat by radiation is neglected, the parameter Rd that describes radiation takes zero value and when increasing intensity of thermal radiation, the parameter takes larger values. Solutions are found for the values 0, 0.5 and 10 of the parameter Rd. Increasing values of the parameter Rd can increase thermal boundary layer thickness. Shateyi [8] investigated thermal radiation and buoyancy effects on heat and mass transfer over a semi-infinite stretching surface with suction and blowing. It was found that when the Grashof number increases, the fluid velocity also increases. However, this same effect was found to decrease both thermal and concentration boundary layers. The flow is appreciably influenced by thermal radiation. It was observed that increasing the thermal radiation parameter produces significant increase in the thermal conditions of the fluid temperature which induces more fluid in the boundary layer through buoyancy effect, causing the velocity of the fluid to increase. The hydrodynamic boundary layer and thermal boundary layer thicknesses increase as a result of increasing radiation. However, the concentration boundary layer thickness decreases as a result of increasing the thermal radiation parameter. It was also observed that increasing the Schmidt number, induces reduction in the distribution of concentration in the boundary layer. Natural convection of an electrically conducting and radiating fluid in the presence of an external magnetic field is numerically investigated by Akiyama and Chong [9]. The two opposing side walls are differentially heated with a specified temperature difference, while the top and bottom walls are insulated. Basically three types of fluids are considered: opaque, transparent and participating fluids. The results are presented in the form of isotherms and streamline contours, mid-plane velocity profiles, and total heat transfer rates across the enclosure. The main conclusions are as follows: In case of the opaque fluid, the effect of an imposed magnetic field is to suppress the convection. If the fluid is not opaque in the absence of an external magnetic field, the flow structure and the temperature field in an enclosure are considerably affected by the radiation. In the framework of the same radiation environment, the thermo-fluid dynamics behavior of a radiating fluid is substantially altered together with the strength of the imposed magnetic field. For the transparent fluid, the effect of the magnetic field is as follows: in the mid-region apart from the adiabatic walls, the applied magnetic field affects the degree of tilting of a streamline axis appreciably. The radiation effect on a thermal field is localized near the adiabatic walls. Inversely, the thermal distribution in the mid-region is affected by the magnetic field rather than the radiation. In terms of the participating fluid, as the magnetic field becomes stronger, the unicellular flow originally turns into the flow with the inner core including two convective rolls. The overall flow in the enclosure is suppressed by the retarding effect of the Lorentz force. Nevertheless the axis of the resulting streamline is not slanted even in the presence of a strong magnetic field. On the other hand, the thermal distribution in the participating fluid is seriously affected by not only the external magnetic field but radiation, even in the region far from the insulated walls. In general terms, it was found that the main effect of the external magnetic field is to reduce the overall heat transfer rate across the enclosure. More specifically, regardless the fluid type, the distribution of conductive Nusselt number decreases for both hot and cold walls in accordance with the increase in the strength of the magnetic field. A similar trend is observed with the radiative Nusselt number distribution. As a consequence, the increase in Hartmann number leads to the decrease in the local Nusselt number distribution, thereby resulting in the decrease of the average Nusselt number.
Combined heat and mass transfer has attracted considerable attention due to its importance in various fields such as in engineering as well as geophysical applications. Comprehensive reviews of this area have been made by many researches, some of them are Nield and Bejan [10] and Trevisan and Bejan [11]. The efficient utilization of energy is the primary objective in the design of any thermodynamic system, which can be achieved by entropy generation minimization. Theoritical method of entropy generation has been used to treat external and internal irreversibilities. In thermosolutal convection, irreversibilities are mainly due to heat transfer, mass transfer and fluid flow. Second law analysis in heat transfer and thermal design was described in details by Bejan [12,13]. Generally speaking, the irreversibility phenomena, which are expressed by entropy generation, are related to heat transfer, mass transfer, viscous dissipation, chemical reactions, magnetic field, etc. Magherbi et al. [14] numerically studied entropy generation in convective heat and mass transfer through an oriented square cavity for the case of aiding buoyancy forces. They showed that maximum value of entropy generation increases with thermal Grashof number and it was obtained at an inclination angle of the cavity α = 45° for GrT = 104. Entropy generation increases with the buoyancy forces that induce an augmentation of exchanged heat between the flow and the walls. Hidouri et al. [15] studied the influence of Soret effect on entropy generation in double diffusive convection for the case of a binary perfect gas mixture for both aiding and opposing buoyancy forces through a square cavity. They showed that entropy generation takes a minimum value for the case of opposing buoyancy forces with equal intensity (i.e., N = −1) when thermal Grashof values GrT ≥ 105. In a similar way, the influence of Dufour effect on entropy generation in convective heat and mass transfer for a binary perfect gas mixture was numerically studied by Magherbi et al. [16]. They showed that entropy generation takes also a minimum value when N = −1 for values of thermal Grashof number GrT ≥ 104.
The purpose of this paper is to investigate radiative and magnetic effects on entropy generation in thermosolutal convection with heat and mass transfer flow in 2D approximation for both aiding and opposing buoyancy forces, which is in our knowledge, has not been studied yet. Thus, this study is a complementary study to those of Hidouri et al. [15] and Magherbi et al. [16]. In this case, the enclosure is subjected to an oriented magnetic field. Effects of the thermal Rayleigh number, the buoyancy ratio, the Hartmann number, the Radiation parameter and the inclination angle of the magnetic field on entropy generation in steady-unsteady states as well as on local irreversibility are studied.

2. Problem Statement

A two-dimensional square vertical cavity is submitted to an oriented magnetic field, B as shown in Figure 1. The two vertical left and right walls are at different but uniform temperatures and concentrations (T’h, C’h) and (T’c, C’c), while the two horizontal walls are insulated and adiabatic. Radiatively, fluid nonparticipating medium and all surfaces are gray; the radiative heat flux in y direction is negligible as compared to that in the x direction. The fluid, consists of a binary mixture of air and a diffusing species and considered as a Newtonian, Boussinesq incompressible fluid whose properties are described by its kinematic viscosity ν, its thermal and solutal diffusivities, αT and D, and its thermal and solutal volumetric expansion coefficients βT and βc. The mass density of the fluid varies linearly with temperature and concentration, such that:
ρ = ρo [1 − βT (T’ − T’o) − βc (C’ − C’o)]
where:
β T   1 ρ o   (     ρ   T   ) P
β c   1 ρ o   (     ρ   C   ) P
Figure 1. Schematic view of the Physical model.
Figure 1. Schematic view of the Physical model.
Entropy 13 01992 g001

3. Analysis

3.1. Governing Equations

The continuity, momentum, energy and species conservation equations in dimensionless form for the considered problem are given by:
u x + v y = 0
u t + d i v   J u = P x + Pr . H a 2 ( v cos α u sin α ) sin α
v t + d i v   J v = P y + G r ( T + N . S ) + Pr . H a 2 ( u sin α v cos α ) cos α
T t + d i v J T = 0
C t + d i v J C = 0
with:
J u   = u . V Pr   g r a d   u
J v   =   v . V     Pr   g r a d   v
J T   =   T . V   ( 1 + N r )   g r a d   T
J C   =   C . V     1 L e g r a d   C
The used dimensionless variables are given by:
x = x L ;   y = y L ;   u = u U ;   v = v U ;   t = t U L ;   p = p ρ 0 U 2 ;   T = T T 0 Δ T ;   C = C C 0 Δ C
U   * = α L ;   Pr   =   ν α T ;   Δ T   =   T h T c ;   Δ C   =   C h C c
G r T = g β T . Δ T . L 3 ν ² ; G r C = g β C . Δ C . L 3 ν ² , N = G r C G r T ; λ = ρ α T C p
H a ² = σ e B   ² L ² μ ; Pr = v α T ; N r = 4 σ 0 T 0 3 3 λ k * ; L e = α T D

3.2. Initial and Boundary Conditions

The initial and boundary conditions appropriate to the laminar flow within the differential heated cavity are:
at, t = 0 for whole space:
u = v = 0; P = 0; C = 0.5 − x and T = 0.5 − x
Adiabatic walls:
  φ y = 0   at   y = 0   and   y = 1
Active walls:
φ =   0.5             On   plane           x   =   0
φ   =   0.5         On   plane           x   =   1
φ: physical parameter representing temperature or concentration.

3.3. Entropy Generation

The rate of entropy generation (which is derived from energy and entropy balances), for the case of heat and mass transfer in presence of an external magnetic field is given by [17]:
S ˙ g e n = λ ( T ) 2 T 2 1 T J α i μ i i + τ : g r a d ¯ ¯ v d T + σ e | v d Λ B | T 2
J α i , μ i and v d are mass flux vector of species i in phase α, the chemical potential of species I and dimensional velocity vector, respectively. In a two dimensional flow and for a single diffusing species by considering the simplified hypothesis given in [15,16], Equation (21) can be written as follows:
S ˙ g e n = λ T 0 2 ( g r a d T ) 2 + μ T 0 [ 2 ( u x ) 2 + 2 ( v y ) 2 + ( u y + v x ) 2 ] + R D C 0 ( g r a d C ) 2 + R D Τ o [ ( g r a d C ) . ( g r a d T ) ] + σ e B 2 T 0 ( u sin ϕ v cos ϕ ) 2
The local entropy generation can be putted in a dimensionless form by using the dimensionless variables listed in Equations (13)–(16):
Ν s , = Ν h + Ν f + Ν d S . S + Ν d T . S + Ν B
where:
Ν h = [ ( Τ x ) 2 + ( Τ y ) 2 ]
Ν f = λ 1 [ 2 ( u x ) 2 + 2 ( v y ) 2 + ( v x + u y ) 2 ]
Ν d S . S = λ 2 [ ( C x ) 2 + ( C y ) 2 ]
Ν d T . S = λ 3 [ ( Τ x ) ( C x ) + ( Τ y ) ( C y ) ]
Ν Β = λ 4 ( u sin   α v cos α ) 2
where:
λ 1 = μ λ T 0 ( α T L Δ Τ ) 2
λ 2 = R D Τ o λ S o ( Δ C Δ Τ ) 2
λ 3 = R D T 0 λ ( Δ C Δ Τ )
λ 4 = σ e T 0 λ ( Β α Δ Τ ) 2
λ i is called irreversibility distribution ratios. λ 1 is a coefficient related to viscous entropy generation, while λ 2 and λ 3 are ratios related to diffusion entropy generation by pure concentration gradients and mixed product of thermal and concentration gradients. λ 4 is the ratio related to magnetic entropy generation.
It is important to notice that the entropy generation due to diffusion ( Ν d = Ν d S . S + Ν d T . S ) is the sum of a pure term ( Ν d S . S ) which involves concentration gradient only and a crossed term ( Ν d T . S ) with both thermal and concentration gradients. The dimensionless total entropy generation is the integral over the system volume of dimensionless local entropy generation:
S = V Ν S . l d V
The temperature and concentration gradients are computed along the hot wall of the cavity, and then used to calculate the average Nusselt and Sherwood numbers, respectively, as:
Ν u ¯ = 0 1 ( T y ) d x
S h ¯ = 0 1 ( C y ) d x

3.4. Numerical Solution

Energy and momentum equations are solved by determination of temperature and velocity field which depend on choice of numerical support of resolution. In this study we used a Control Volume Finite-Elements Method (CVFEM) of Saabas and Baliga [18]. Standard-staggered grids are used and diagonals are added to form triangular elements where velocity components are calculated. For pressure, staggered grid is used. Pressure and velocity components are calculated at different points to avoid numerical oscillations. To resolve pressure-velocity components, the SIMPLE algorithm (Semi Implicit Method for pressure linked equations) of Patankar [19] is used then the SIMPLER algorithm (SIMPLE Revised) and the SIMPLEC approximation of Van doormal and Raithby in which addition terms of pressure and their relative to velocity are considered in conjunction with an Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI) scheme for performing the time evolution.
The used numerical code, which is written in FORTRAN language, to solve the governing equations is validated by an important physical parameter which is Nusselt number. Calculated results are in good agreement with those given in literature as indicated in Table 1. As it can be seen from Table 2, Grids of 31 × 31, 41 × 41 and 51 × 51 nodal points for respectively Ra = 103,104 and 105 are found sufficiently enough to achieve convergence criterion given by equation of continuity such that:
( u x + v y ) 10 5
The transient study is carried out with a step time Δt = 10−4 for all considered Thermal Rayleigh numbers.
Table 1. Comparison of average Nusselt number for different values of Rayleigh number in a square cavity with Pr = 0.71, N = 0, Ha = 0.
Table 1. Comparison of average Nusselt number for different values of Rayleigh number in a square cavity with Pr = 0.71, N = 0, Ha = 0.
Ra = Gr × PrDavis [20]Nithyadevi et al. [21]Present Study
1031.1181.1231.099
1042.2432.3042.295
1054.5194.8994.664
Table 2. Grid size independence study.
Table 2. Grid size independence study.
Grid SizeRaNuEr (%)
21 × 211,0001.1024-
31 × 311.09920.29
41 × 411.09790.408
31 × 3110,0002.3201-
41 × 412.29561.055
51 × 512.28321.59
41 × 41100,0004.7097-
51 × 514.66410.968
61 × 614.65931.07
Error percentage is given by:
E r ( % ) = ( | N u ( x + 10 , x + 10 ) N u ( x , x ) | / N u ( x , x ) ) × 100
where x represents the Grid size.

4. Results and Discussions

In this parametric study, the Prandtl number was fixed at 0.71. Thermal Rayleigh number, irreversibility distribution ratios and the inclination angle of the magnetic field are in the following ranges: 103 ≤ Ra ≤ 105; 10−7 λ 1 ≤ 10−4, 10−1 λ 2 ≤ 0.5; 10−5 λ 3 ≤ 10−2 and 0° ≤ α ≤ 180°, respectively. λ 2 and λ 3 are equal to 0 in natural convection regime.
In absence of both magnetic field and radiation effects, Figure 2 illustrates transient entropy generation for different values of thermal Rayleigh number. As it can be seen, for relatively lower and moderate thermal Rayleigh numbers (i.e., 103 ≤ Ra ≤ 104, entropy generation quickly decreases from a maximum value at the beginning of the transient state), then asymptotically decreases towards a constant value in steady state, showing that the system evolves in the linear branch of thermodynamics for irreversible processes. On increasing the thermal Rayleigh number (i.e., Ra ≥ 105), transient entropy generation exhibits an oscillatory behavior showing that the system is in a spiral approach corresponding to non linear branch of thermodynamics for irreversible processes. As time proceeds, entropy generation reaches a maximum then asymptotically decreases towards a constant value in steady state.
Figure 2. Dimensionless total entropy generation versus time for: α = 0°; Ha = 0; N = 0; Nr = 0.
Figure 2. Dimensionless total entropy generation versus time for: α = 0°; Ha = 0; N = 0; Nr = 0.
Entropy 13 01992 g002
Influence of both magnetic and radiation effects on Nusselt number and entropy generation in steady state for Gr = 105 is illustrated in Figure 3a and Figure 3b. As it can be seen, magnetic and radiation parameters induce the decrease of heat transfer expressed by Nusselt number towards unity value. Thus radiation effect reduces Nusselt number and homogenizes the temperature inside the cavity by reducing the temperature gap between the two insulated walls. It enhances the heat transfer inside the cavity. Magnetic effect by Lorentz force suppresses the flow. The increase of heat transfer inside the enclosure induces the increase of entropy generation as illustrated in Figure 3b. It is important to notice that the increase of Hartmann number considerably induces the decrease of entropy generation regardless the radiation parameter.
Figure 3. Average Nusselt number (a) and Dimensionless total entropy generation (b) versus Radiation parameter for different Hartmann numbers: Ra = 105; N = 0.
Figure 3. Average Nusselt number (a) and Dimensionless total entropy generation (b) versus Radiation parameter for different Hartmann numbers: Ra = 105; N = 0.
Entropy 13 01992 g003
From Figure 4a, entropy generation is mainly due to magnetic and viscous irreversibilities for the case where N = −1 and Ha = 25. This is due to the fact that both thermal and concentration gradients are at their minimum values, then entropy generation is induced by magnetic and viscous irreversibilities. A critical radiation parameter from which entropy generation takes a constant value is obtained and equal to 50. Minimum entropy generation considerably depends on both buoyancy ratio and radiation parameter. As it can be seen from Figure 4b, this minimum is obtained at N = −1 and Nr = 0, this result is in good agreement with that obtained by Hidouri et al. [15] and Magherbi et al. [16]. As radiation parameter increases, buoyancy ratio corresponding to minimum entropy generation are shifted to values smaller than −1. In this case, this minimum is obtained at N = −2 and −3 for Nr = 6 and 40, respectively. It is important to notice that minimum entropy generation increases with radiation parameter, since radiation heat transfer increases inside the enclosure. Entropy generation amplitude is higher for the case of aiding buoyancy forces than that of opposing buoyancy forces since thermal, concentration and velocity gradients are more important when N ≻ 0.
Figure 4. Dimensionless entropy generation versus radiation parameter for N = −1 and Ha = 25 (a) and versus buoyancy ratios for different radiation parameter values at Ha = 25 (b) Ra = 105; α = 0°.
Figure 4. Dimensionless entropy generation versus radiation parameter for N = −1 and Ha = 25 (a) and versus buoyancy ratios for different radiation parameter values at Ha = 25 (b) Ra = 105; α = 0°.
Entropy 13 01992 g004
In order to illustrate the influence of magnetic, radiation and buoyancy ratio parameters on heat and mass transfer, Figure 5a shows that radiation parameter enhances heat transfer inside the cavity and Nusselt number value tends towards zero value for Nr ≥ 20 indicating that all heat transfer is generated inside the enclosure. Inversely mass transfer, which is expressed by Sherwood number, has similar behaviour of entropy generation. In this case, Sherwood number is minimum for N = −1 where velocity, thermal and concentration gradients are at their minimum values. This minimum increases with radiation parameter showing that mass transfer increases with radiation effects. Sherwood number is higher for aiding buoyancy forces than that of opposing ones as indicated by Figure 5b. Both heat and mass transfer decrease towards unity value for considerable Hartmann number value (i.e., Ha ≥ 100) showing that magnetic field tends to stabilize the system regardless radiation parameter as indicated in Figure 5c.
Figure 5. Average Nusselt number (a) Average Sherwood number (b) versus buoyancy ratio for different radiation parameters (c) Nusselt and Sherwood numbers versus Hartmann number for different radiation parameters: Ra = 105; α = 0°.
Figure 5. Average Nusselt number (a) Average Sherwood number (b) versus buoyancy ratio for different radiation parameters (c) Nusselt and Sherwood numbers versus Hartmann number for different radiation parameters: Ra = 105; α = 0°.
Entropy 13 01992 g005
Figure 6 illustrates the effect of radiation parameter on velocity profiles, the horizontal velocity component decreases at the left half of the cavity and increases at the right half with increasing of radiation parameter. The opposite behaviour is observed for the vertical velocity component. Thus, velocity shows a centrosymetric trend. Similar results are obtained for temperature and concentration profiles. As radiation parameter increases temperature profiles tend to linearity (see Figure 7). The influence of the magnetic field’s inclination angle is illustrated in Figure 8, which indicated that the angle of 80° corresponds to maximum values of Nusselt and Sherwood numbers and for total entropy generation but minimum values are found for an angle around 135°.
Figure 6. Midsection x-component velocity at y = 0.5 (a) and midsection y-component velocity at x = 0.5 (b) for different Radiation parameters: Ra = 105; α = 0°; Ha = 25; N = 0.
Figure 6. Midsection x-component velocity at y = 0.5 (a) and midsection y-component velocity at x = 0.5 (b) for different Radiation parameters: Ra = 105; α = 0°; Ha = 25; N = 0.
Entropy 13 01992 g006
Figure 7. Midsection y-component temperature (a) and concentration (b) at y = 0.5 for different Radiation parameters Ra = 105; α = 0°; Ha = 25; N = 0.
Figure 7. Midsection y-component temperature (a) and concentration (b) at y = 0.5 for different Radiation parameters Ra = 105; α = 0°; Ha = 25; N = 0.
Entropy 13 01992 g007
Figure 8. Average Nusselt number (a) Average Sherwood number (b) and Total entropy generation (c) versus inclination angle of magnetic field for different radiation parameters: Ra = 105; α = 0°; Ha = 25 and N = 0.
Figure 8. Average Nusselt number (a) Average Sherwood number (b) and Total entropy generation (c) versus inclination angle of magnetic field for different radiation parameters: Ra = 105; α = 0°; Ha = 25 and N = 0.
Entropy 13 01992 g008
Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 illustrate isothermal lines, stream lines and irreversibility lines. In natural convection (i.e., N = 0) and in absence of a magnetic effect (i.e., Ha = 0), Figure 9 shows that isothermal lines are confined through the bottom region of the heated wall and the upper region of the cooled wall, a two cells structure of the flow is observed and irreversibility is localized on the indicated regions. As radiation parameter increases, horizontal temperature through the active wall decreases as well as velocity gradients inducing a one cell structure for Nr ≥ 6. The irreversibility lines are dispersed along the active as well as the insulated walls with decreasing amplitude. Thus, increasing radiation effect induces homogenous behaviour of fluid flow as well as thermal gradients inside the cavity leading to decrease of local entropy generation. In presence of a magnetic field (i.e., Ha = 25), Figure 10 shows that both radiation and magnetic effects tend to stabilize the system even for relatively higher thermal Rayleigh number (i.e., Ra ≥105). Figure 11 shows the case where thermal and concentration gradients have the same amplitude and act in opposite way (i.e., N = −1). In this case, isothermal lines are mainly parallel to active walls showing a quasi conduction mode with a unicellular structure and increasing two cells structure of entropy generation as radiation parameter enhances both heat and mass transfer inside the enclosure.
Figure 9. Isothermal lines, Stream lines and Isentropic lines for Ha = 0; N = 0 and Ra = 105 with different radiation parameter at horizontal magnetic field.
Figure 9. Isothermal lines, Stream lines and Isentropic lines for Ha = 0; N = 0 and Ra = 105 with different radiation parameter at horizontal magnetic field.
Entropy 13 01992 g009aEntropy 13 01992 g009b
Figure 10. Isothermal lines, Stream lines and Isentropic lines for Ha = 25; N = 0 and Ra = 105 with different radiation parameter at horizontal magnetic field.
Figure 10. Isothermal lines, Stream lines and Isentropic lines for Ha = 25; N = 0 and Ra = 105 with different radiation parameter at horizontal magnetic field.
Entropy 13 01992 g010aEntropy 13 01992 g010b
Figure 11. Isothermal lines, Stream lines and Isentropic lines for Ha = 25; N = −1 and Ra = 105 with different radiation parameter at horizontal magnetic field.
Figure 11. Isothermal lines, Stream lines and Isentropic lines for Ha = 25; N = −1 and Ra = 105 with different radiation parameter at horizontal magnetic field.
Entropy 13 01992 g011aEntropy 13 01992 g011b

5. Conclusions

Entropy generation at thermosolutal convection in presence of radiation and magnetic effects in a square cavity is numerically investigated by using the Control Volume Finite-Element Method (CVFEM). Results show that the influence of the thermal Rayleigh number, the buoyancy ratio, the Hartmann number, the inclination angle of the magnetic field and the radiation parameter on entropy generation are evaluated. It was found that increasing of Hartmann and radiation parameters leads to a decrease of Nusselt number until reaching unity value. Magnetic effect by Lorentz force offered a resistance to the flow. Entropy generation increases with radiation parameter but it decreases with Hartmann number. Total entropy generation is influenced by the buoyancy ratio, a minimum is observed for N = −1, its variation is more pronounced for the case of cooperative buoyancy forces than in the opposite case. Inclination angle of 80° corresponds to maximum values of Nusselt and Sherwood numbers and total entropy generation whereas minimum values are found for an angle of 135°. In the presence of radiation, isothermal lines become more vertical and parallel; the flow structure exhibits a monocellular shape.

Nomenclature

A
aspect Ratio of the cavity
C
dimensionless concentration
C’
concentration (mol∙m−3)
C 0
bulk concentration (mol∙m−3)
Cp
isobaric specific heat (J∙Kg−1∙K−1)
D
species diffusivity (m2∙s−1)
g
gravitational acceleration (m∙s−2)
GrT
thermal Grashof number
GrC
solutal Grashof number
H (L)
height (length) of the cavity (m)
Ha
Hartmann number
J
dimensionless diffusion flux
k *
mean absorption coefficient (m−1)
Le
Lewis number
N
Buoyancy ratio
Nu
Nusselt number
Ν s ,
dimensionless local entropy generation
S
dimensionless total entropy generation
Nr
Radiation parameter
P
pressure (N∙m−2)
Pr
Prandtl number
R a T
Rayleigh number
Sc
Schmidt number
Sh
Sherwood number
C h
hot side concentration (mol∙m−3)
C c
cold side concentration (mol∙m−3)
S g e n *
volumetric entropy generation rate (J∙m−3∙s−1∙K−1)
T
dimensionless temperature
T’
temperature (K)
t
dimensionless time
t’
time (s)
Tc
hot side temperature (K)
T’f
cold side temperature (K)
T’o
bulk temperature (K)
u, v
dimensionless velocity components
V
dimensionless velocity vector
U*
characteristic velocity (m∙s−1)
u’, v’
velocity components along x’, y’ respectively (m∙s−1)
x, y, z
dimensionless Coordinates
x’, y’, z’
Cartesian coordinates (m)
Greek Symbols
 
α
magnetic field’s angle with horizontal direction (°)
αT
thermal diffusivity (m2∙s−1)
Β
inclination angle of the cavity (°)
βT
thermal expansion coefficient (K−1)
βc
compositional expansion coefficient (mol−1∙m3)
λi
irreversibility distribution ratio, (i = 1, 2, 3, 4)
μ
dynamic viscosity (kg∙m−1∙s−1)
ρ
fluid density (kg∙m−3)
σe
electrical conductivity (Ω−1∙m−1)
σ0
Stephan-Boltzmann constant
υ
kinematic viscosity (m2∙s−1)
ΔT’
temperature difference (K)
ΔC’
concentration difference (mol∙m−3)

References

  1. Mansour, M.A.; El-Shaer, N.A. Radiative effects on magnetohydrodynamic natural convection flows saturated in porous media. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2001, 237, 327–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. El Arabawy, H.A.M. Effect of suction/injection on the flow of a micropolar fluid past a continuously moving plate in the presence of radiation. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2003, 46, 1471–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ibrahim, F.S.; Mansour, M.A.; Hamad, M.A.A. Lie-group analysis of radiative and magneticfield effects on free convection and mass transfer flow past a semi-infinite vertical flat plate. Electr. J. Differ. Equ. 2005, 39, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dolapc, I.T.; Pakdemirli, M. Approximate symmetries of creeping flow equations of a second grade fluid. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 2004, 39, 1603–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ramachandra, V.P.; Reddy, N.B.; Muthucumaraswamy, R. Transient radiative hydromagnetic free convection flow past an impulsively started vertical plate with uniform heat and mass flux. Theor. Appl. Mech. 2006, 33, 31–63. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ramachandra, V.P.; Reddy, N.B.; Muthucumaraswamy, R. Finite difference analysis of Radiation and Mass transfer effects on MHD free convection flow past a vertical plate in the presence of heat source/sink. Int. Rev. Pure Appl. Math. 2006, 2, 141–160. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rani, T.R. Effect of Radiation and Magnetic Field on Mixed Convection at a Vertical Plate in a Porous Medium with Variable Fluid Properties and Varying Wall Temperature. In Proceedings of the International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, HongKong, China, 17–19 March 2010; Volume 3.
  8. Shateyi, S. Thermal radiation and buoyancy effects on heatand mass transfer over a semi-infinite stretching surface with suction and blowing. J. Appl. Math. 2008, 2008, 414830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Akiyama, M.; Chong, Q.P. Numerical analysis of natural convection with surface radiation in a square cavity. Heat Transf. 1997, 31, 419–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nield, D.A.; Bejan, A. Convection in Porous Media, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  11. Trevisan, O.V.; Bejan, A. Combined heat and mass transfer by natural convection in porous medium. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1985, 28, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bejan, A. Second law analysis in heat transfer and thermal design. Adv. Heat Transf. 1982, 15, 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bejan, A. Entropy Generation Minimization; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  14. Magherbi, M.; Abbassi, H.; Hidouri, N.; Ben Brahim, A. Second law analysis in convective heat and mass transfer. Entropy 2006, 8, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hidouri, N.; Magherbi, M.; Abbassi, H.; Ben Brahim, A. Entropy generation in double diffusive in presence of Soret effect. Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2007, 5, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Magherbi, M.; Hidouri, N.; Abbassi, H.; Ben Brahim, A. Influence of Dufour effect on entropy generation in double diffusive convection. Int. J. Exergy 2007, 4, 227–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Woods, L.C. The Thermodynamics of Fluid Systems; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  18. Saabas, H.J.; Baliga, B.R. Co-located equal-order control-volume finite-element method for multidimensional incompressible fluid flow—Part I: Formulation. Numer. Heat Transf. 1994, 26, 381–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patankar, S.V. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow (Hemisphere Series on Computational Methods in Mechanics and Thermal Science); Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  20. De Vahl Davis, G. Natural convection of air in a square cavity: A benchmark numerical solution. Int. J. Numer. Method. Fluid. 1983, 3, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nithyadevi, N.; Sivasankaran, S.; Kandaswamy, P. Buoyancy-driven convection of water near its density maximum with time periodic partially active vertical walls. Meccanica 2007, 42, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hidouri, N.; Bouabid, M.; Magherbi, M.; Brahim, A.B. Effects of Radiation Heat Transfer on Entropy Generation at Thermosolutal Convection in a Square Cavity Subjected to a Magnetic Field. Entropy 2011, 13, 1992-2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/e13121992

AMA Style

Hidouri N, Bouabid M, Magherbi M, Brahim AB. Effects of Radiation Heat Transfer on Entropy Generation at Thermosolutal Convection in a Square Cavity Subjected to a Magnetic Field. Entropy. 2011; 13(12):1992-2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/e13121992

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hidouri, Nejib, Mounir Bouabid, Mourad Magherbi, and Ammar Ben Brahim. 2011. "Effects of Radiation Heat Transfer on Entropy Generation at Thermosolutal Convection in a Square Cavity Subjected to a Magnetic Field" Entropy 13, no. 12: 1992-2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/e13121992

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop